The 5 Reasons why Cricket is more American than Baseball The is background about the long history cricket in America as well as a nice group of photos from around the world.. By explaining the five freedoms that cricketers have but baseball players do not, the book makes a convincing argument th
| TITLE | : | The 5 Reasons why Cricket is more American than Baseball |
| AUTHOR | : | |
| RATING | : | 4.65 (907 Votes) |
| ASIN | : | 0983638233 |
| FORMAT TYPE | : | Paperback |
| PAGES | : | 78 Pages |
| PUBLISH | : | 2011-07-28 |
| GENRE | : |
This book details five reasons why Cricket is more American than Baseball. By explaining the five freedoms that cricketers have but baseball players do not, the book makes a convincing argument that Cricket is more American. The five freedoms are compared and contrasted across the two sports. The is background about the long history cricket in America as well as a nice group of photos from around the world.
EDITORIAL :
About the Author
Michael Johnson lives with his lovely bride Kathryn in a quiet house on a nice patch of God's green earth in Wisconsin. Michael is a public speaker, business consultant, and cricket fanatic. When he is not speaking or consulting, he is usually writing another oddly interesting book.
REVIEW :
There have been numerous specialised books on robotics, going back decades. For example, lots of MRA discussions on domestic violence boil down to two claims: Domestic violence happens to men as often as to women, and seeing it as an issue in which women are primarily the victims is evidence of sexism against men, or "misandry." One meme I saw going around on Facebook that illustrated this was a picture of a sign that read "End Violence Against Women," but with "women" scratched out so that the sign read "End Violence Against Everyone." In fact, as Dragiewicz aptly puts it, “gender equality arguments are generally couched as arguments that men and women should be equally treated according to standards developed from the life experiences of men, when in fact they are differently situated.” I would be remiss if I did not quote another section: "The implication of insisting that
No comments:
Post a Comment